<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pfizer Inc. (PFE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockherd.com/moosepond/2005/07/pfizer-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockherd.com/moosepond/2005/07/pfizer-inc/</link>
	<description>Online Journal for the Moose Pond Investors Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://stockherd.com/moosepond/2005/07/pfizer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockherd.com/moosepond/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Susan:  I would say that 2003 and 2004 are definitely atypical for PFE.  Despite the recent reduction is sales growth, PFE seems to have strong managment, plenty of cash and a pipeline of new drugs.  Also, it is at an all time low PE (around 22).  I am compfortable buying it.  There were several posts on the NAIC CompuServe forum on this same topic.  - Ty H.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan:  I would say that 2003 and 2004 are definitely atypical for PFE.  Despite the recent reduction is sales growth, PFE seems to have strong managment, plenty of cash and a pipeline of new drugs.  Also, it is at an all time low PE (around 22).  I am compfortable buying it.  There were several posts on the NAIC CompuServe forum on this same topic.  &#8211; Ty H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://stockherd.com/moosepond/2005/07/pfizer-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockherd.com/moosepond/?p=57#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Ty, are we looking at year 2003 as an outlier?  What about the last several quarters? Is this solely due to the recall of the Cox II inhibitors?  With an anemic return of 1.2 percent in sales, and moving forward expiration in several patents, it will make sense to take a wait see attitude to see what pans out from the R&amp;D pipeline.

Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ty, are we looking at year 2003 as an outlier?  What about the last several quarters? Is this solely due to the recall of the Cox II inhibitors?  With an anemic return of 1.2 percent in sales, and moving forward expiration in several patents, it will make sense to take a wait see attitude to see what pans out from the R&#038;D pipeline.</p>
<p>Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.403 seconds -->
