My spouse and I decided to convert one of our IRAs to a portfolio of index-based exchange traded funds (ETFs). We looked primarily at Vanguard and iShares index-based ETFs. We put together a list of candidate ETFs by asset class.
Both family of funds have relatively low expense ratios, with Vanguard being the lowest. Except for two micro cap ETFs, we eliminated any ETFs that had an expense ratio higher than 50 basis points (0.50%). We also built a worksheet to help allocate funds among the various asset classes. You can see the results of this research and the ETF worksheet in a Google spreadsheet or the original Excel spreadsheet.
Here is a portfolio made up of exchange traded funds. This portfolio has no bond or fixed income component. It provides both relatively high return and moderate volatility making it appropriate for the long term.
The portfolio currently has an asset allocation of: 45% domestic stocks, 35% international stocks, and 20% REITs. The portfolio was rebalanced earlier this year to include greater international exposure.
This portfolio includes 13 ETFs and one index fund. The ETFs and one index fund are based on broad market indices. Vanguard ETFs predominate because they offer the lowest expense ratios and they closely track the market indices they track.
An ETF-based portfolio does not have include this many different subclasses of assets. A total of three three to five ETFs is all that is needed to get the benefit of diversification across different asset classes. Here are two examples:
Note: VFINX is an index mutual fund. However, it can be purchased through an on-line broker.
In a recent letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal, John Bogle cautions that of the 690 exchange traded funds (ETFs) in existence today, only 12 represent broad market segments, such as the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Wilshire Total (U.S.) Stock Market Index, and the Morgan Stanley EAFE (Europe, Australia and Far East) Index of non-U.S. stocks.
However, he goes on to comment: ETFs, simply put, are index funds that can be traded in the financial markets. In fairness, if they are not traded, they can often be the equal of the classic index funds.
ETFs that represent broad market indices offer several advantages to the small investor. First, they can be traded like stocks, there is no minimum purchase. When the corresponding index fund is purchased outside of an IRA, there is usually a minimum ($3,000 for many of the Vanguard funds). Second, the ETFs typically have a slightly lower expense ratio. For example, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VTSMX) is a mutual fund with an expense ratio of 0.19%. The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is the corresponding exchange traded fund and has an expense ratio of 0.07%. For a $10,000 investment, the 0.12% difference in expenses would result in $12 in buying the ETF. This enough to offset the commission, assuming it is purchased through a discount broker.
Learn more about index fund investing at the Bogle Financial Markets Research Center and The Bogle eBlog.
While selecting stocks and building a solid portfolio can be rewarding, not everyone has the time or interest to do so. Also, core portfolio assets (e.g., the money you need to retire) deserve special protection. Index funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) make it possible to build a diversified, tax efficient portfolio that requires little maintenance beyond periodic (quarterly or annual) rebalancing. Using ETFs or index funds to diversify among several asset classes increases the long term rate of return and reduces portfolio risk.
An index fund is a mutual fund consisting of stocks that correspond with a market index. An ETF is a stock certificate reflecting underlying assets that correspond with a market index. Index funds are bought and sold like mutual funds, i.e., at the end of each trading day. ETFs trade continuously traded throughout the business day on the major exchanges like other stocks.
Index funds can be purchased through some of the large family of funds. Vanguard and Fidelity offer a wide range of low cost index funds. You also can purchase index funds through a broker, but this usually results in a brokerage fee. Since ETFs are traded as stocks, they can be purchased through any broker. While there is a brokerage fee for purchasing ETFs, there is no minimum dollar amount or number of shares. Since they are mutual funds, index funds require some minimum purchase. For smaller portfolios, it may be easier to diversify using ETFs. (more…)
Each quarter, Standard & Poors published a report that compares the performance of professionally mutual funds with the performance performance of the S&P broad market indices. The report is called the S&P Indices Versus Active Funds (SPIVA) Scorecard. The S&P analysis shows that the most mutual funds fail to outperform the market indices. As the time horizon gets longer, the performance by the professional fund managers gets worse. The complete SPIVA can be found here.
Here are some details from the S&P report for the 4th quarter of 2006.
In 2006, domestic equity stocks indices led actively managed large-cap and small-cap funds. The S&P 500 outperformed 69.1% of large-cap funds and the S&P SmallCap 600 led 63.6% of small-cap funds. Conversely, 53.3% of mid-cap funds outperformed the S&P MidCap 400.
Over longer time periods, the market indices continue to outperform a majority of the actively managed funds. Over the past three years (and five years), the S&P 500 has beaten 66.7% (71.4%) of large-cap funds, the S&P MidCap 400 has outperformed 65.1% (79.7%) of mid-cap funds, and the S&P SmallCap 600 has outpaced 80.6% (77.5%) of small-cap funds.
Why do the indices perform better than actively managed funds? The short answer is that fund fees are higher and many funds do not do a good job of selecting stocks or managing their portfolios. (Most funds are exceptionally good at collecting fees, however.) A number of funds fail to put the financial interests of their shareholders ahead of their own. (The recent after hours trading scandal by fund managers is one example. Another is excessive fees.)
Fees and expenses erode net return on mutual funds. Management fees typically range from 0.5% to 1.5%. (In contrast, management fees for some of the largest and oldest index funds are generally less than 0.2%.) In addition, mutual funds also pay various transaction transaction and portfolios. These fees are not disclosed in their prospecting but are contained in a statement of additional information. Some have high turnover of assets. High portfolio turnover raises expenses, increases tax liability, and often degrades performance.
When evaluating a mutual fund, it important to compare its performance to the index that most closely corresponds to the style of the fund (large cap value, mid cap blend, small cap value, etc.). Also keep in mind that index funds tend to be more tax efficient. Low turnover reduces the annual tax bite.
How do you know if the mutual fund you are considering buying is one of the few that has outperformed market? First, go to www.fundalarm.com and see how the fund has done over the past 1, 3 ,and 5 years. FundAlarm.com compares fund performance with the benchmark that most closely corresponds to the fund style. Second, look at the expense ration for the funds and sales commission. Morningstar also compares fund performance with an index benchmark. The management fee for a domestic equity fund should not exceeds 0.8%. Pass on any funds that charge a load or 12b1 fee.
So what relevance does this have to the Model Investment? First, it is not easy to beat the market. We try but do not always succeed. Second, it is important to minimize transaction fees and expenses.